Lo que el aprendizaje del lenguaje revela sobre el lenguaje (y sobre la cognición social)
Synopsis
References
Akita, K. (2009), A Grammar of Sound-Symbolic Words in Japanese: Theoretical Approaches to Iconic and Lexical Properties of Mimetics, PH. D. dissertation, Kobe University.
Asano, et al. (2011), “Preverbal infants’s sensitivity to sound symbolism: An EEG study”, Neuroscience Research, 71S e108-e415.
—. (2015), “Sound symbolism scaffolds language development in preverbal infants”, Cortex, 63, pp. 196-205.
Bar-On, D. (2004), “Semantic Eliminativism and the ‘Theory’-Theory of linguistic understanding”, en: Ezcurdia, M. et al., New Essays in Philosophy of Language and Mind, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Calgary: Univ. of Calgary Press, pp. 159-200.
—. (2013), “Origins of Meaning: Must We ‘Go Gricean’?”, Mind & Language, 28, 3, pp. 342-375.
Bateson, M. C. (1979), “The epigenesis of conversational interaction: A personal account of research development”, en: Bullowa, M. (ed.), Before speech: The beginning of human communication, London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63-77.
Bavelas, J. (2007), “Face-to-face Dialogue as a Micro-social Context”, en: Levy, E., S. Duncan y J. Casell, Gesture and the dynamical dimension of language, Essays in honor of David McNeill, Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Co., pp. 127-146.
Beattie, G. (2003), Visible Thought: The New Language or Body Language, Londres: Routledge.
Bergen, B. K. (2004), “The psychological reality of phonaesthemes”, Language, 80: 290-311.
Berlin, B. (1994), “Evidence for pervasive synesthetic sound symbolism in ethnozoological nomenclature”, en: Hinton, L., J. Nichols y J. Ohala (eds.), Sound Symbolism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 76-93.
Bickerton, D. (2004), “Mothering plus vocalization doesn’t equal language”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 4, pp. 504-505.
Bolinger, D. R. (1950), “Assonance and Morpheme Analysis, Word, 23, pp. 117-134.
Bortfeld, H. (2004), “Which came first: Infants learning language or motherese?”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 4, pp. 505-506.
Bouissac, P. (2004), “How plausible is the motherese hypothesis?”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 4, pp. 506-507.
Bråten, S. y C. Trevarthen (2007), “From infant intersubjectivity and participant movements to simulation and conversation in cultural common sense”, en: Bråten, S. (ed.), On Being Moved. From Mirror Neurons to Empathy, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company, pp. 21-34.
Burnham, D., Ch. Kitamura y U. Vollmer-Conna (2002), “What’s new, Pussycat? On Talking to Babies and Animals”, Science, 296 (5572), p. 1435.
Cassidy, K. W., M. H. Kelly y L. J. Sharoni (1999), “Inferring gender from name phonology”, J Exp Psychol Gen, 128, pp. 362-381.
Chen, Y-C. et al. (2016), “When ‘Bouba’ equals ‘Kiki’: Cultural commonalities and cultural differences in sound-shape correspondences”, Scientific Reports, 6 26681.
Chomsky, N. (1975), Reflexiones sobre el lenguaje, Barcelona: Ariel.
Davidson, D. (2001), “La aparición del pensamiento”, en: Davidson, D., Subjetivo, Intersubjetivo, Objetivo, Madrid: Cátedra, pp. 176-190.
De Jaegher, H., E. Di Paolo y S. Gallagher (2010), “Can social interaction constitute social cognition?”, Trends in Cognitive Science, 14, 10, pp. 441- 447.
Dissanayake, E. (2000), “Antecedents of the temporal arts in early mother-infant interaction”, en: Wallin, N. L., B. Merker y S. Brown (eds.), The Origins of Music, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 389-410.
—. (2004), “Motherese is but one part of a ritualized, multimodal, temporally organized, affiliative interaction”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 4, pp. 512-513.
Elias, J. Z. y S. Gallagher (2014), “Word as Object: A View of Language at Hand”, Journal of Cognition and Culture, 14, pp. 373-384.
Falk, D. (2004), “Pre-linguistic evolution in early hominins: Whence Motherese?”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 4, pp. 491-541.
Fay, N., S. Garrod, L. Roberts y N. Swoboda (2010), “The Interactive Evolution of Human Communication Systems”, Cognitive Science, 34, 3, pp. 351-386.
Fernald, A. (1985), “Four-months-old infants prefer to listen to motherese”, Infant Behavior and Development, Vol. 8, 2, pp. 181-195.
—. (1989), “Intonation and communicative intent in mother’s speech to infants: is the melody the message?”, Child Development, 60, pp. 1497- 1510.
—. (1991), “Prosody in speech to children: Prelinguistic and Linguistic Functions”, Annals of Child Development, 8, pp. 43-80.
Fernald, A. et al. (1989), “A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers and fathers’s speech to preverbal infants”, J. Child Lang., 16, pp. 477-501.
Fernald, A. y C. Mazzie (1991), “Prosody and focus in speech to infants and adults”, Developmental Psychology, 27, 2, pp. 209-221.
Fisher, A. (1999), “What, if anything, is phonological iconicity?”, en: Nänny, M. y O. Fisher (eds.), Form Miming Meaning: Iconicity in Language and Literature, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, pp. 123-133.
Fitch, T. (2010), The Evolution of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gallagher, S. (2009), “Two Problems of Intersubjectivity”, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16, 6-8, pp. 289-308.
—. (2013), “When the problem of inter-subjectivity becomes the solution”, en: Legerstee, M., D. Haley y M. H. Bornstein, The Infant Mind, Origins of the Social Brain, New York, London: The Guildford Press, pp. 48-74.
Gallagher, S. y D. Hutto (2008), “Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice”, en: Zlatev, J. J., et al. (eds.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 17-38.
Gogate, L. J., L. E. Bahrick y J. D. Watson (2000), “A study of multimodal motherese: The role of temporal synchrony between verbal labels and gestures”, Child Development, 71, 4, pp. 878-894.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2007), “Pointing sets the stage for learning language – and creating language”, Child Development, 78, 3, pp. 741-745.
Gratier, M. y C. Trevarthen (2008), “Musical Narrative and Motives for Culture in Mother-Infant Vocal Interaction”, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 15, 10-11, pp. 122-158.
Hauser, M. D., N. Chomsky y T. Fitch (2002), “The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?”, Science, 298, pp. 1569- 1579.
Imai, M. et al. (2008), “Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning”, Cognition, 109, 1, pp. 54-65.
Imai, M. y S. Kita (2014), “The sound symbolism bottstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution”, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 369: 20130298.
Irvine, E. (2016), “Method and Evidence: Gesture and Iconicity in the Evolution of Language”, Mind & Language, 31, 2, pp. 221-247.
Iverson, J. M. (2010), “Multimodality in infancy: vocal-motor and speech-gesture coordinations in typical and atypical development”, Enfance, 3, pp. 257-274.
Iverson, J. M. y S. Goldin-Meadow (1998), “Why people gesture when they speak?, Nature, 396, p. 228.
Iverson, J. M. et al. (1999), “Gesturing in Mother-Infant Interactions”, Cognitive Development, 14, 1, pp. 57-75.
Jespersen, O. (1921), Language: Its Nature, Development, and Origin, London: Allen and Unwin.
Karmiloff, K. y A. Karmiloff Smith (2001), Pathways to language: From Fetus to Adolescent, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kohler, W. (1929), Gestalt Psychology, New York: Liverlight Pub. Corporation.
Korta, K. (2002), “Hacer Filosofía del Lenguaje”, Revista de Filosofía, 27, 2, pp. 337-359.
Le Cron Forster, M. (1978), “The symbolic structure of primordial language”, en: Washburn, Sherwood L. y Elizabeth R. McCown (eds.), Human Evolution: Biosocial Perspectives, Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/ Cummings, pp. 77-121.
Legerstee, M. (1990), “Infant use of multimodal information to imitate speech sounds”, Infant Behavior and Development, 13, 3, pp. 343-354.
Legerstee, M., D. Haley y M. H. Bornstein (2013), The Infant Mind. Origins of the Social Brain, New York, London: The Guildford Press.
Levinson, S. C. y J. Holler (2014), “The origin of human multi-modal communication”, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 369, 20130302. (doi:10.1098/ rstb.2013.0302).
Levy, E., S. Duncan y J. Casell (2007), “The dynamical dimension of language”, en: Levy, E., S. Duncan y J. Casell, Gesture and the dynamical dimension of language, Essays in honor of David McNeill, Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Co., pp. 3-12.
Malloch, S. N. (1999), “Mothers and infants and communicative musicality”, Musicae Scientiae, 1999-2000, Special Issue: Rhythm, musical narrative, and the origins of human communication, pp. 29-57.
McLuhan, M. (1964), Comprender los medios de comunicación. Las extensiones del ser humano, Barcelona: Paidós.
McNeill, D. (2000), Language and Gesture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
—. (2005), Gesture and Thought, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
—. (2012), How Language Began: Gesture and Speech in Human Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mehler, J. et al. (1988), “A precursor of language acquisition in young infants”, Cognition, 29, 2, pp. 143-178.
Messinger, D. S. y A. Fogel (1998), “Give and take: The development of conventional infant gestures”, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 44, 4, pp. 566- 590.
Mithen, S. (2005), Los neandertales cantaban rap. Los orígenes de la música y el lenguaje, Barcelona: Crítica.
Monaghan, P. et al. (2014), “How arbitrary is language?”, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 369: 20130299.
Monaghan P., K. Mattock y P. Walker (2012), “The role of sound symbolism in word learning”, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 38, 5, pp. 1152-1164. (doi:10.1037/ a0027747)
Nelson, D. G. K. et al. (1989), “How the prosodic cues in motherese might assist in language learning”, Journal of Child Language, 16, 1, pp. 55-68.
Nygaard, L. C. et al. (2009a), “The semantics of prosody: acoustic and perceptual evidence of prosodic correlates to word meaning”, Cog. Sci., 33, 1, pp. 127-146.
—. (2009b), “Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning”, Cognition, 112, 1, pp. 181-186.
Ohala, J. J. (1994), “The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch”, en: Hinton, L., J. Nichols y J. J. Ohala (eds.), Sound Symbolism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 325-347.
Orr, E. y R. Geva (2015), “Symbolic play and language development”, Infant Behavior and Development, 38, pp. 147-161.
Overgaard, S. y J. Michael (2015), “The Interactive Turn in Social Cognition Research: A Critique”, Philosophical Psychology, 28, 2, pp. 160-183.
Ozturk, O., M. Krehm y A. Vouloumanos (2013), “Sound symbolism in infancy: evidence for sound-shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds”, J. Exp. Child Psychol., 114, pp. 173-186.
Parault, S. J. y P. J. Schwanenflugel (2006), “Sound Symbolism: A piece in a puzzle of word learning”, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 4, pp. 329-351.
Peña, M., J. Mehler y M. Nespor (2011), “The Role of Audiovisual Processing in Early Conceptual Development”, Psychol. Sci., 2, 11, pp. 1419-1421.
Perniss P., R. L. Thompson y G. Vigliocco (2010), “Iconicity as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages”, Front. Psychology 1, 227. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227.
Perniss, P. y G. Vigliocco (2014), “The bridge of iconicity: from the world of experience to the experience of language”, Philos. Tran. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol., 369(1654):20140179.
Petito, L. A. et al. (2004), “Baby hands that move to the rhythm of language: hearing babies acquiring sign languages babble silently on the hands”, Cognition, 93, 1, pp. 43-73.
Pinker, S. (1994), El instinto del lenguaje, Madrid: Alianza.
Premack, D. y G. Woodruff (1978), “Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, pp. 515-526.
Ramachandran, V. S. y E. M. Hubbard (2001), “Synaesthesia – A Window Into Perception, Thought and Language”, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 12, pp. 3-34.
Sapir, E. (1929), “A study in phonetic symbolism”, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, pp. 225-239.
Saussure, F. (1916), Curso de Lingüística General, Buenos Aires: Losada, 1945.
Scotto, C. (2002), “Intreracción y atribución mental: la perspectiva de la segunda persona”, Análisis Filosófico, 22, 2, pp. 135-152.
Sidhu, D. M. y P. M. Pexman (2015), “What’s in a Name? Sound Symbolism and Gender in First Names”, PLoS ONE, 10(5): e0126809, doi: 10.1371/1/journal.pone.0126809.
Sinha, C. y C. Rodríguez (2008), “Language and the signifying object: From convention to imagination”, en: Zlatev et al. (eds.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity, John Benjamins Publishing Co., pp. 357-378.
Small, M. F. (1998), Our Babies, Ourselves: How Biology and Culture Shape the Way We Parent, New York: Anchor Books.
Snow, C. E. (1977), “The development of the conversation between mothers and babies”, J. Child Lang, 4, pp. 1-22.
Soderstrom, M. (2007), “Beyond babytalk: Re-evaluating the nature and content of speech input to preverbal infants”, Developmental Review, 27, pp. 501-532.
Sterelny, K. (2012), The Evolved Apprentice: How Evolution Made Humans Unique, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thompson, R. L. et al. (2012), “The Road to Language Learning is Iconic: Evidence from British Sign Language”, Psychological Science, 23, 12, pp. 1-6.
Tomasello, M. (2000), “A usage-based approach to child language acquisition”, en Bavin, E. L. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Child Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 69-87.
—. (2003), Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
—. (2008), La evolución de la comunicación humana, Buenos Aires: Katz, 2013.
Trainor, L. J., C. M. Austin y R. N. Desjardins (2000), “Is infant-directed speech prosody a result of the vocal expression of emotion?”, Psychological Science, 11, pp. 188-195.
Trevarthen, C. (1974), “Conversations with a two-month-old”, New Scientist, 2 May, pp. 230-235.
—. (1979), “Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity”, en: Bullowa, M. (ed.), Before speech, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 321-348.
—. (1999), “Musicality and the intrinsic motive pulse: Evidence from human psychobiology and infant communication”, Musicae Scientiae, 1999-2000, pp. 155-215.
—. (2002), “Making sense of infants making sense”, Intellectica, 1, 34, pp. 161-188.
—. (2005a), “Action and emotion in development of the human self, its sociability and cultural intelligence: Why infants have feelings like ours”, en: Nadel, J. y D. Muir (eds.), Emotional development, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 61-91.
—. (2005b), “First things first: infants make good use of the sympathetic rhythm of imitation, without reason or language”, Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 31, 1, pp. 91-113.
—. (2008a), “Shared minds and the science of fiction. Why theories will differ”, en: Zlatev, J. et al. (eds.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
—. (2008b), “The musical art of infant conversation: Narrating in the time of sympathetic experience, without rational interpretation, before words”, en: Imberty, M. y M. Gratier (eds.), Musicae Scientiae, Special Issue: “Narrative in music and interaction”, pp. 15-46.
Trevarthen, C. y J. Delafield-Butt, (2013), “Biology of Shared Experience and Language Development: Regulations for the Intersubjective Life of Narratives”, en: Legerstee, M., D. W. Haley y M. H. Bornstein (eds.), The infant mind: origins of the social brain, New York, London: The Guilford Press, pp. 167-199.
Trevarthen, C. y K. J. Aitken (2001), “Infant Intersubjectivity: Research, Theory, and Clinical Applications”, J. Child Psychol. Psychiat., 42, 1, pp. 3-48.
Trevarthen, C. y P. Hubley (1978), “Secondary intersubjectivity: Confidence, confiding and acts of meaning in the first year”, en: Lock, A. (ed.), Action, gesture and symbol: The emergence of language, London: Academic Press, pp. 183-229.
Tsur, R. (2005), “Size-sound symbolism revisited”, Journal of Pragmatics, 38, pp. 905-924.
Tylén, K. et al. (2010), “Language as a Tool for Interacting Minds”, Mind & Language, 25, 1, pp. 3-29.
Vigliocco, G., P. Perniss y D. Vinson (2014), “Language as a multimodal phenomenon: implications for language learning, processing and evolution”, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 369: 20130292. Disponible en: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0292 [19/05/2017].
Vygotsky, L. (1978), Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walker, P. et al. (2010), “Preverbal Infants’ Sensitivity to Synaesthetic Cross-Modality Correspondences”, Psychol. Sci., 21, pp. 21-25.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953), Investigaciones Filosóficas, México: UNAM.
—. (1967), Zettel, México: UNAM, 1985.
—. (1969), Sobre la certeza, Caracas: Tiempo Nuevo.
—. (1980), Observaciones sobre la filosofía de la psicología, Vols. I y II, UNAM: México.
Zlatev, J. (2008), “The co-evolution of intersubjectivity and bodily mimesis”, en: Zlatev et al. (eds.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity, John Benjamins Publishing Co., pp. 215-44.
Zlatev, J. et al. (2008), “Intersubjectivity: What makes us human?”, en: Zlatev et al. (eds.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity, John Benjamins Publishing Co., pp. 1-14.
Downloads
Pages
Published
Series
Categories
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.