Lo que la segunda persona no es

References

Apperly, I. A. y S. A. Butterfill (2009), “Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states?”, Psychological Review, 116(4), pp. 953-970. 

Bohl, V. y W. van der Bos (2012), “Toward an integrative account of social cognition: marrying theory of mind and interactionism to study the interplay of Type 1 and Type 2 processes”, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6, p. 274. 

Buber, M. (1923), Ich und du, Verlag Lambert Schneider. [Yo y Tú, Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión, 1977]. 

Butterfill, S. A. (2013), “Interacting mindreaders”, Philosophical Studies, 165/3, pp. 841-863. 

Carruthers, P. F. (2011), The opacity of mind: an integrative theory of self-knowledge, Oxford University Press. 

Costall, A. (1995), “Socializing affordances”, Theory and Psychology, 5, pp. 467-482. 

Darwall, S. (2006), The second person standpoint, Harvard University Press. 

—. (2013a), Morality, Authority and Law: Essays in Second-Personal Ethics 1, Oxford University Press. 

—. (2013b), Honor, History and Relationship: Essays in Second-Personal Ethics 2, Oxford University Press. 

Davidson, D. (1992), “The second person”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 17/1, pp. 255-267. 

Davies, M. y T. Stone (eds.) (1995a), Folk Psychology: The Theory of Mind Debate, Cambridge: Blackwell. 

—. (1995b), Mental Simulation. Evaluations and Applications, Cambridge: Blackwell. 

De Jaegher, H. (2009), “Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting”, Consciousness and cognition, 18/2, pp. 535-542. 

De Jaegher, H., E. Di Paolo y S. Gallagher (2010), “Can social interaction constitute social cognition?”, Trends in the Cognitive Sciences, 14/10, pp. 441-447. 

De Jaegher, H. y E. Di Paolo (2007), “Participatory sense-making”, Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, 6, pp. 485-507. 

Di Paolo, E. (2005), “Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), pp. 429-452. 

Frith, C. (2012), “The role of meta-cognition in human social interactions”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 13, pp. 2213-2223. 

Gallagher, S. (2001), “The practice of mind: theory, simulation or interaction?”, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, pp. 83-107. 

—. (2008), “Understanding others: embodied social cognition”, en Calvo, P. y A. Gomila (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Science: an embodied approach, Elsevier, pp. 439-451. 

Gallese, V. (2005), “‘Being like me’: self-other identity, mirror neurons and empathy”, en: Hurley, S. y N. Chater (eds.), Perspectives on imitation: from cognitive neuroscience to social science, Vol. 1, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 101-118. 

—. (2014), “Bodily selves in relation: embodied simulation as secondperson perspective on intersubjectivity”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369:20130177. 

Goldman, A. (1989), “Interpretation psychologized”, Mind and Language, 4/3, pp. 161-185. 

—. (1992), “In defense of the simulation theory”, Mind and Language, 7/2, pp. 104-119. 

Gómez, J. C. (1996), “Second person intentional relations and the evolution of social understanding”, Behavioural and Brian Science, 19 (1), p. 129. 

Gomila, A. (2001), “La perspectiva de segunda persona: mecanismos mentales de la intersubjectividad”, Contrastes, 6, pp. 65-86. 

—. (2002), “La perspectiva de segunda persona de la atribución mental”, Azafea, 1, pp. 123-138. 

—. (2011), “Emergencia y explicación en sistemas complejos: el caso de la explicación social”, en: Pérez Chico, D. y L. P. Rodríguez Suárez (eds.), Explicar y comprender, Plaza y Valdés, pp. 343-368. 

—. (2013), Verbal Minds: Language and the Architecture of Cognition, Elsevier. 

—. (2015), “Emociones en segunda persona”, Boletín de estudios de filosofía y cultura, 10, pp. 37-50. 

Gomila, A. y P. Calvo (2008), “Directions for an Embodied Cognitive Science: Toward an Integrated Approach” en: Calvo, P. y A. Gomila (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Science. An embodied Approach, Elsevier, pp. 1-25. 

Hobson, J. y P. Hobson (2007), “Identification: the missing link between joint attention and imitation?”, Development and Psychopathology, 19/2, pp. 411-431.

Hobson, P. (1993), Autism and the development of mind, LEA. 

Hutto, D. y E. Myin (2013), Radicalizing enactivism: basic minds without content, Cambridge: The MIT Press. 

Lévinas, E. (1963), Difficile liberté: Essais sur le judaïsme, París: Albin Michel, (3ª edición revisada, 1976). 

Murray, L. y C. Trevarthen (1985), “Emotional regulation of interactions between two-month-olds and their mothers”, en: Field, T. y N. Fox (eds.), Social perception in infants, Norwood: Ablex, pp. 177-197. 

Pérez, D. (2013), Sentir, desear, creer. Una aproximación filosófica a los conceptos psicológicos, Buenos Aires: Prometeo. 

Pérez, D. y A. Gomila (en prensa), “La atribución mental y la segunda persona”. 

Perner, J. y J. Roessler (2012), “From infants’ to children’s appreciation of belief”, Trends Cogn Sci., 16(10), pp. 519-525. 

Reddy, V. (1996), “Omitting the second person in social understanding”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, pp. 140-141 

—. (2008), How Infants Know Minds, Harvard University Press. 

Ricoeur, P. (1956), “Sympathie et respect: Phénoménologie et étique de la seconde personne”, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 59/4, pp. 380-397. 

Scheler, M. (1923), Wesen und Formen der Sympatie. [Esencias y formas de la simpatía, Ed. Sígueme, 2005]. 

Schillbach, L. et al. (2013), “Towards a second-person neuroscience”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, pp. 393-462. 

Sebanz, N., H. Bekkering y G. Knoblich (2006), “Joint action: bodies and minds moving together”, Trends in the Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), pp. 70-76. 

Shanton, K. y A. Goldman (2010), “Simulation theory”, WIREs Cognitive Sciences, 1, pp. 527-538. 

Strawson, P. (1962), “Freedom and Resentment”, Proceedings of the British Academy, 48, pp. 1-25. [“Libertad y resentimiento”, Cuadernos de Crítica Nº 47, 1992]. 

Strogatz, S. H. (2001), “Exploring the dynamics of complex networks”, Nature, 410, pp. 268-276. 

Thompson, E. (2007), Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Trevarthen C. (1979), “Communication and cooperation in early infancy. A description of primary intersubjectivity”, en: Bullova, M. (ed.), Before Speech: The beginning of early communication, Cambridge University Press, pp. 321-347. 

—. (1998), “The concept and foundations of infant intersubjectivity”, en: Brâten, S. (ed.), Intersubjective, communication and emotion in early, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15-46. 

Wittgenstein, L. (1967), Zettel, University of California Press.