Atención compartida, triangulación y la perspectiva de la segunda persona

Authors

Pablo Quintanilla

Synopsis

 

References

 

Amoretti, M. C. y G. Preyer (eds.) (2011), Triangulation from an epistemological point of view, Frankfurt: Ontos-Verlag. 

Baron-Cohen, S. (1995), Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind, MIT Press. 

Beebe, B. et al. (2013), “On Knowing and Being Known in the 4th Month Origins of Disorganized Attachment: An Emerging Presymbolic Theory of Mind”, en: Metcalfe, J. y H. S. Terrace (eds.), Agency and Joint Attention, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 100-124. 

Carpenter, M. y J. Call (2013), “How Joint is the Joint Attention of Apes and Human Infants?”, en: Metcalfe, J. y H. S. Terrace (eds.), Agency and Joint Attention, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 49-61. 

Carpenter, M. y K. Liebal (2011), “Joint Attention, Communication, and Knowing Together in Infancy”, en: Seeman, A. (ed.), Joint Attention. New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind, and Social Neuroscience, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, pp. 159-181. 

Cavell, M. (1993), The psychoanalytic mind. From Freud to philosophy, Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press. 

—. (2006), Becoming a subject. Reflections in philosophy and psychoanalysis, Oxford: Clarendon Press. 

Darwall, S. (2006), The second person standpoint: morality, respect and accountability, Harvard University Press. 

Davidson, D. (2001a), “The second person”, en: Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, Oxford University Press. 

—. (2001b), Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, Oxford University Press. 

Dilthey, W. (1989), Introduction to the Human Sciences, editado por Makkreel, R. y F. Rodi, Princeton University Press. 

Eilan, N. (2005), “Joint Attention, Communication, and Mind”, en: Eilan, N. et al. (eds.), Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 1-33. 

Flavell, J. H et al., (1981), “Young children’s knowledge about visual perception: Further evidence for the level 1-level 2 distinction”, Developmental Psychology, 17, pp. 99-103. 

Flavell, J. H., S. G. Shipstead y K. Croft (1978), “Young’s children’s knowledge about visual perception: Hiding objects from others”, en: Child Development, 49, pp. 1208-1211. 

Gallese, V. (2005), How the body shapes the mind, Oxford: Clarendon Press. 

Goldman, A. (1993), “The Psychology of Folk Psychology”, en: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16. 

—. (1995a), “Interpretation Psychologized”, en: Davies, M. y T. Stone (eds.), Folk Psychology. The Theory of Mind Debate, Oxford: Blackwell. 

—. (1995b), “In Defense of the Simulation Theory”, en: Davies, M. y T. Stone (eds.), Folk Psychology. The Theory of Mind Debate, Oxford: Blackwell. 

Gomila, A. (2001), “La perspectiva de segunda persona: mecanismos mentales de la intersubjetividad”, Contrastes, Vol. suplementario 6: monográfico sobre Filosofía actual de la mente, Martínez-Freire, P. (ed.), pp. 65-86. 

—. (2008), “La dimensión moral de la perspectiva de segunda persona”, en Pérez, D. y L. Fernández (eds.), Cuestiones filosóficas: ensayos en honor de Eduardo Rabossi, Catálogos, pp. 155-173. 

—. (2009a), “La relevancia moral de la segunda persona”, disponible en: https://antonigomila.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/homenatge_ rabossi_preprint.pdf [23/05/2017] 

—. (2009b), “La perspectiva de segunda persona de la atribución mental”, en: Azafea: Revista de Filosofía, Nov. 20; [citado 2016 Ago 3], disponible en: http://revistas.usal.es/index.php/0213-3563/article/ view/3719 [23/05/2017] 

—. (2012), Verbal Minds: Language and the Architecture of Cognition, Elsevier. 

Gordon, R. (1995a), “Folk Psychology as Simulation”, en: Davies, M. y T. Stone (eds.), Folk Psychology. The Theory of Mind Debate, Oxford: Blackwell. 

—. (1995b), “The Simulation Theory: Objections and Misconceptions”, en: Davies, M. y T. Stone (eds.), Folk Psychology. The Theory of Mind Debate, Oxford: Blackwell. 

—. (1995c), “Simulation without Introspection or Reference from Me to You”, en: Davies, M. y T. Stone (eds.), Mental Simulation: Evaluations and Applications, Oxford: Blackwell. 

Husserl, E. (1965), Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy: Philosophy as Rigorous Science, and Philosophy and the Crisis of European Man, Nueva York: Harper and Row. 

James, W. (1989) [1890], Principios de psicología, México: FCE.

Leavens, D. A. (2011), “Joint Attention: Twelve Myths”, en: Seeman, A. (ed.), Joint Attention. New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind, and Social Neuroscience. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 43-72. 

Leslie, A. (1992), “Pretense, Autism, and the Theory-of-Mind Module”, disponible en: http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/images/personal-alan-leslie/ publications/Leslie%201992.pdf [23/05/2017] 

Masangkayet, Z. S et al. (1974), “The early development of inferences about the visual percepts of others”, Child Development, 45, pp. 357-366. 

Moll, H. y A. Meltzoff (2011), “Joint Attention as the Fundamental Basis of Understanding Perspectives”, en: Seeman, A. (ed.), Joint Attention. New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind, and Social Neuroscience. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 393-413. 

Myers, R. y C. Verheggen (2016), Donald Davidson’s triangulation argument. A philosophical inquiry, Routledge Studies in Twentieth Century Philosophy. 

Peacocke, C. (2005), “Joint attention: its nature, reflexivity and relation to common knowledge”, en: Eilan, H. y R. McCormack (eds.), Joint attention: communication and other minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 298-324. 

Premack, D. y G. Woodruff (1978), “Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?”, en: Behavioural Brain Sciences, 4, pp. 515-526. 

Quintanilla, P. (2004), “Comprender al otro es crear un espacio compartido: caridad, empatía y triangulación”, Ideas y Valores, N° 124, agosto. 

—. (2008a), “Comprensión, imaginación y transformación”, Areté, Vol. XX, N° 1. 

—. (2008b), “Taylor contra Davidson: intérpretes participantes o no comprometidos”, en: Agüero, G., L. Uturbey y D. Vera Murúa (eds.), Conceptos, creencias y racionalidad, Córdoba: Universidad de Córdoba. 

—. (2014), “La evolución de la atribución psicológica: lectura de mentes y metacognición”, en: Quintanilla, P., C. Mantilla y P. Cépeda, Cognición social y lenguaje. La intersubjetividad en la evolución de la especie y en el desarrollo del niño, Lima: PUCP. 

Quintanilla, P., C. Mantilla y P. Cépeda (2014), Cognición social y lenguaje. La intersubjetividad en la evolución de la especie y en el desarrollo del niño, Lima: PUCP. 

Seemann, A. (2011), “Joint attention. Toward a relational account”, en: Seemann, A. (ed.), Joint attention. New developments is psychology, philosophy of mind and social neuroscience, Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 183-202.

Seemann, A. (ed.) (2011), Joint attention. New developments is psychology, philosophy of mind and social neuroscience, Cambridge: The MIT Press. 

Stern, D. (1991), El mundo interpersonal del infante. Una perspectiva desde el psicoanálisis y la psicología evolutiva, Buenos Aires: Paidós. 

Stueber, K. (2011), “Social Cognition and the Allure of the Second-Person Perspective: in Defense of Empathy and Simulation”, en: Seemann, A. (ed.) Joint attention. New developments is psychology, philosophy of mind and social neuroscience, Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 265-292. 

Tomasello, M. (1995), “Language is not an instinct”, Cognitive Development, 10, pp. 131-156. 

—. (1999), The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 

Winnicott, D. (1971), Playing and Reality, London: Tavistock. 

Wittgenstein, L. (1988) [1953], Investigaciones filosóficas, México: UNAM.

 

 

Downloads

Published

January 1, 2017

How to Cite

Quintanilla, P. (2017). Atención compartida, triangulación y la perspectiva de la segunda persona. In D. Pérez & D. Lawler (Eds.), La segunda persona y las emociones (pp. 141-166). Editorial SADAF. https://doi.org/10.36446/editorialsadaf.4.5