¿Cognición social sin atribución psicológica? Una propuesta enactiva

Bibliografía

Auvrey, M., C. Lenay y J. Stewart (2009), “Perceptual interactions in a minimalist virtual environment”, New Ideas in Psychology, 27(1), pp. 32-47. 

Balmaceda, T. (2014), Psicología de sentido común. Pasado, presente y futuros, Buenos Aires: Título. 

Balmaceda, T. y F. Burdman (en prensa), “Precisiones en torno al debate entre las posiciones tradicionales y los nuevos enfoques por la Psicología de Sentido Común”, en prensa en: Skidelsky, L., D. Lawler y D. Pérez (eds.), Temas de Filosofía de la Psicología. 

Boden, M. (2000), “Autopoiesis and Life”, Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1, pp. 117-145. 

Brunsteins, P. (2010), La Psicología Folk: teorías, prácticas y perspectivas, Ediciones del Signo. 

Burdman, F. (2015), “El postcognitivismo en cuestión: extensión, corporización y enactivismo”, Principia, Vol. 19, Nº 3, pp. 475-495. 

Chemero, A. (2009), Radical Embodied Cognitive Science, Cambridge: MIT Press. 

Clark, A. y D. Chalmers (1998), “The Extended Mind”, Analysis, 58, pp. 10-23. 

Colombetti, G. (2009), “Enaction, sense-making and emotion”, en: Stewart, J., O. Gapenne y E. Di Paolo (eds.), Enaction: towards a new paradigm for cognitive science, Cambridge: The MIT Press. 

Cuffari, E., E. Di Paolo y J. De Jaegher (2014), “From participatory sense-making to language: there and back again”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14 (4), pp. 1089-1125. 

De Jaegher, H. y E. Di Paolo (2007), “Participatory Sense-Making: An Enactive Approach to Social Cognition”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6, pp. 485-507. 

—. (2013), “Enactivism is not Interactionism”, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 345:1-2. 

De Jaegher, H., E. Di Paolo y S. Gallagher (2010), “Can social interaction constitute social cognition?”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14 (10), pp. 441-447.

De Jaegher, H. y T. Froese (2009), “On the role of social interaction in individual agency”, Adaptive Behavior, 17(5), pp. 444-460. 

Di Paolo, E. (2000), “Behavioral coordination, structural congruence and entrainment in acoustically coupled agents”, Adaptive Behavior, 8, pp. 27 -47. 

—. (2005), “Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, pp. 429-432. 

Di Paolo, E. y H. De Jaegher (2015), “Toward an embodied science of intersubjectivity: widening the scope of social understanding research”, Frontiers in Psychology, 6: 234. 

Di Paolo, E., M. Rohde y H. De Jaegher (2010), “Horizons for the enactive mind: Values, social interaction, and play”, en: Stewart, J., O. Gapenne y E. Di Paolo (eds.), Enaction: Towards a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science, Cambridge: MIT Press. 

Froese, T. y E. Di Paolo (2009), “Sociality and the life–mind continuity thesis”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, pp. 439-463. 

Gallagher, S. (2001), “The practice of mind. Theory, simulation or primary interaction?”, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8 (5-7), pp. 83-108. 

—. (2004), “Understanding interpersonal problems in autism: Interaction theory as an alternative to theory of mind”, Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology, 11 (3), pp. 199-217. 

Gomila, A. (2002), “La perspectiva de segunda persona de la atribución mental”, Azafea, 4, pp. 123-138. 

Hutto, D. (2004), “The limits of spectatorial folk psychology”, Mind and Language, 19, pp. 548-573. 

Jonas, H. (1966), The phenomenon of life: Towards a philosophical biology, Evanston: Northwestern University Press. 

Maturana, H. y F. Varela (1980), Autopoiesis and Cognition: The realization of the living, Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing. 

—. (1987), El árbol del conocimiento, trad. esp., Buenos Aires: Lumen, 1996. 

Noë, A. (2001), “Experience and the Active Mind”, Synthese, 129, pp. 41-60. 

—. (2004), Action in Perception, Cambridge: MIT Press. 

—. (2009), Out of Our Heads. Why You Are Not Your Brain and Other Lessons from the Biology of Consciousness, New York: Hill and Wang. 

Pérez, D. (2013), Sentir, desear, creer. Una aproximación filosófica a los conceptos psicológicos, Buenos Aires: Prometeo Libros.

Ratcliffe, M. (2007), “From Folk Psychology to Commonsense”, en: Hutto, D. y M. Ratcliffe (eds.), Folk Psychology Re-Assessed, pp. 223-243. 

Scotto, C. (2002), “Interacción y atribución mental: la perspectiva de segunda persona”, Análisis Filosófico, XXII, pp. 135-151. 

Thompson, E. (2001), Between ourselves: Second-person issues in the study of consciousness, Exeter: Imprint Academic. 

—. (2004), “Life and Mind: From Autopoiesis to Neurophenomenology”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3, pp. 381-398. 

—. (2007) Mind in Life. Biology, Phenomenology and the Sciences of Mind, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 

Thompson, E. y M. Stapleton (2009), “Making Sense of Sense-Making: Reflections on Enactive and Extended Mind Theories”, Topoi, 28, pp. 23-30. 

Torrance, S. (2006), “In search of the enactive: Introduction to the special issue on enactive experience”, Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences, 4, pp. 357-368. 

Varela, F. (1991), “Organism: A meshwork of selfless selves”, en: Tauber, A. (ed.), Organism and the origins of self, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 

—. (1997), “Patterns of life: Intertwining identity and cognition”, Brain and Cognition, 34, pp. 72–87. 

Varela, F., E. Thompson y E. Rosch (1991), The Embodied Mind. Cognitive Science and Human Experience, Cambridge: MIT Press. 

Weber, A. y F. Varela (2002), “Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, pp. 97-125.